As most everyone has heard, the Bush tax cuts are set to expire on December 31, 2010. If nothing is done a huge tax increase will be placed upon the highest income earning Americans.
Many have different opinions on whether this is a good idea, if the rich deserve a tax break, if they are paying their fair share… All of this talk reminds me of a cute little tax fable that was given to me many years ago and I thought now was a good time to share.
I was having lunch with one of my friends last week, and the conversation turned to the government’s recent round of tax cuts. “I’m opposed to those tax cuts,” my progressive friend declared, “because they benefit the rich. The rich get much more money back than ordinary taxpayers like you and I, and that’s not fair.”
“But the rich pay more in the first place,” I argued, “so it stands to reason that they’d get more money back.” I could tell that my friend was unimpressed by this meager argument. So, let’s put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand.
Suppose that every day 10 men go out to dinner. The bill for all ten comes to $100. If it were paid the way we pay our taxes, the first four men would pay nothing; the fifth would pay $1; the sixth would pay $3; the seventh $7; the eighth $12; the ninth $18. The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.
The 10 men ate dinner in the restaurant every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement until the owner threw them a curve. “Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I’m going to reduce the cost of your daily meal by $20.” Now dinner for 10 costs only $80.
The first four are unaffected. They still eat for free. Can you figure out how to divvy up the $20 savings among the remaining six so that everyone gets his fair share? The men realize that $20 divided by 6 is $3.33, but if they subtract that from everybody’s share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would end up being paid to eat their meal. The restaurant owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man’s bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay. Here’s what he came up with . . .
The fifth man paid nothing; the sixth pitched in $2; the seventh paid $5; the eighth paid $9; the ninth paid $12; leaving the tenth man with a bill of $52 instead of $59. Outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.
“I only got a dollar out the $20,” declared the sixth man. Pointing to the tenth, he said, “And he got $7!”
“Yeah, that’s right,” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a dollar, too. It’s unfair that he got seven times more than me!”
“That’s true,” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get $7 back when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks.”
“Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison. “We didn’t get anything at all. The system exploits the poor.”
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up. The next night he didn’t show up for dinner, so the nine sat down and ate without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They were $52 short!
And that folks is how a tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. They also are usually the ones that create the jobs. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up at the table anymore. There are lots of good restaurants in Switzerland and the Caribbean.
Great analogy Scott. You won't hear any politician repeating it though.
Posted by: Tim MacLean | September 20, 2010 at 07:16 AM
Outstanding analysis Scott. Thanks very much. You pointed out the obvious facts behind this argument. Someone should read this on all of the news channels.
Posted by: Tracey Jones | September 20, 2010 at 01:54 PM